Legal Opinion

Bank of Moundville v. Walsh

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1927No. 2 Div. 910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The rules for giving or refusing affirmative instruction requested need not be repeated. Tbe same are stated and authorities collected in McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35, 40, 88 So. 135; Jones v. Bell, 201 Ala. 336, 77 So. 998; McCormack Harvesting Mach. Co. v. Lowe, 151 Ala. 313, 44 So. 47.

The action was for rents hy a purchaser of land at a mortgage foreclosure; the same falling due after the foreclosure and transferred or assigned before that event. The defendant is not a tenant, but- a third person purchasing the rent notes, and the basis of the suit is for money received and which it is…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Comer v. SheehanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Christie v. DurdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. English v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1863

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. ZeidlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Walsh v. Bank of MoundvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Smith v. StringerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Miller v. FaustSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. LloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API