Abraham v. Sims
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After further consideration of the questions involved in this proceeding, we are of the opinion *700that the decision rendered by the District Court of Appeal correctly determines the matters at issue therein. We therefore adopt the opinion of that court written by ■ Mr. Justice pro tempore Haines as the opinion of this court. It is as follows:
“This is a mandamus proceeding instituted by Beulah J. Abraham, as petitioner, to require the respondents Virgil J. Sims, A. M. Whipple and W. W. Goodson, as members of and constituting the Boards of Trustees of the Brawley School District in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leymel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Grigsby v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Fidler v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- La Shells v. HenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Martin v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Fry v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Rible v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Pulcifer v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.