Legal Opinion

California Federal Bank v. Matreyek

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1992No. B059760PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant California Federal Bank (CalFed) appeals a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer to its original complaint interposed by defendants and respondents Bill Albin Matreyek, as trustee for the Bill Albin Matreyek Trust and Mary Elizabeth Burney Matreyek Trust U/D/T June 9, 1986 (hereafter, the Matreyeks).

The issues presented are whether CalFed has pled or is capable of pleading causes of action for unjust enrichment and equitable subrogation.

For the reasons discussed below, the judgment is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. King v. Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Buford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. First Nationwide Savings v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API