Legal Opinion

King v. Central Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1977No. S.F. 23465PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

We consider the application of the Unruh Act (Civ. Code, § 1801 et seq.) and the federal Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA) (15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.) to certain aspects of the financing and sale of automobile insurance. According to the complaint herein, defendant Central Bank, National Association (Bank), is engaged in financing automobile insurance policies through its subsidiary, Coast Program, and defendant John P. Roberts Co., Inc. (Roberts). Roberts is a licensed broker engaged in selling insurance on credit under the name “State All Insurance.” On January 15, 1973,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lance Camper Manufacturing Corp. v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Stafford v. Cross Country BankDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
  5. Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API