In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*875 OPINION
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Indirect purchasers1 of domestic eggs and egg products charge producers of those goods, and the producers’ trade groups, with conspiring to manipulate the supply of, and thereby fix prices for, domestically-sold eggs and egg products. The Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (hereinafter, the “IPSAC”)2 alleges violations of federal and state law. The 22 state jurisdictions at issue geographically reach considerably farther than a rooster’s most vigorous crows can be heard. In total, the IPSAC…
2Cases cited197 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Alhassid v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Wilson v. Eyerbank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Meijer, Inc. v. Ferring B.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride & Naloxone) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.