Daniels v. Allen Industries, Inc
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This air pollution class action case raises three questions:(1) Does the judicial "good cause” prerequisite for GCR 1963, 310 discovery require that the objects sought to be discovered be admissible in evidence?(2) Is a trial judge within his discretion in requiring such admissibility as a predicate to allowing discovery?(3) Do public policy considerations compel barring discovery of pollution control studies commis*402sioned by industries because fear of such disclosure might discourage voluntary anti-pollution studies and programs by industry?
We answer all three questions in the negative.
I…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. Charles O. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- J. A. Utley Co. v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Hallett v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Vincent v. Van BlooysMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Ray v. Mason County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Nastal v. Henderson & Associates Investigations, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Woodington v. ShokoohiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.