Legal Opinion

Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1999No. Docket Nos. 108613, 112711, 112712, Calendar Nos. 16-17PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

We granted leave in these cases to determine if the physician-patient privilege set forth in MCL 600.2157; MSA 27A.2157 prevents the defendant hospitals from disclosing the identity of unknown third-party patients. We hold that the names of unknown patients are protected by the physician-patient privilege, and that defendant hospitals have a duty to refrain from disclosure. We also review the Gregory trial court’s order that the defendant hospital provide Gregory with any investigative reports rela*29tive to the incident report; any statements made by any person with respect to the incident; and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StilwillMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Neal v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. VandenBerg v. VandenBergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. RubioTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Texas West Oaks Hospital, LP v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cox v. Flint Board of Hospital ManagersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API