Rose v. Guilford County ex rel. Guilford County Commissioners
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Plaintiffs’ first argument is that the trial court erred in ruling that plaintiffs’ affidavits, which were filed on the day of the summary judgment hearing, were inadmissible. We do not agree. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c) provides, in part: “The adverse party prior to the day of hearing may serve opposing affidavits.” This rule was explained in Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Chantos, 21 N.C. App. 129, 203 S.E. 2d 421 (1974):
It is clear that opposing affidavits are to be served prior to the day of the hearing. It follows that the clear intent of the legislature is that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Allred v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. ChantosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beaver v. HancockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Doby v. LowderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Abell v. Nash County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Angel v. TruittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Bolick v. Townsend Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.