Legal Opinion

Bolick v. Townsend Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 18, 1989No. 8826SC932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

On or about 20 November 1983, plaintiffs and defendants James L. and Gañe T. Bunn entered into a written contract for the purchase of a parcel of land designated as Lot #7, Ludell Lane, Charlotte, North Carolina. Defendant Townsend Company was employed by the Bunns as the real estate company to sell their property. The plaintiffs intended to purchase the property for residential use.

On 21 November 1983, one day after the contract was signed, plaintiffs received a letter from the Townsend Company stating that a home could be built upon the lot in question because the property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Myers & Chapman v. Thomas G. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Olivetti Corp. v. Ames Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Harding v. Southern Loan & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sunset Beach Development, LLC v. AMEC, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Howell v. Town of Carolina BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Wall v. FryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Colombo v. DorrityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Friedman v. Campbell (In re Campbell)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API