Legal Opinion

Beaver v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1985No. 8422SC308PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiff failed to place any exceptions or assignments of error in the record. The appeal nonetheless constitutes an exception to the judgment, and presents the question of whether the judg ment is supported by the conclusions of law. Rule 10(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. A motion for summary judgment requires the court to rule on the legal sufficiency of the pleadings and evidence to raise issues of fact. See Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971). The court finds issues of fact; it does not determine them. See Hotel Corp. v. Taylor, 301 N.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ellis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. White v. HunsingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Williamson v. LiptzinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Weatherford v. GlassmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Clark v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API