Legal Opinion

Harris County Flood Control District v. Mann

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1940No. 7714PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz

This is a mandamus proceeding, instituted directly in the Supreme Court by Harris County Flood Control District against Honorable Gerald C. Mann, Attorney General of Texas, to compel him to approve two issues of bonds proposed to be issued by the District. One issue is for $500,000.00, the other for $3,000,000.00. The validity of the issue for $500,000.00 depends, in the main, on the constitutionality of the Act of the Legislature of this State creating the District, being H. B. 1131, Chapter 360, page 714, Acts Regular Session 45th Legislature, 1937. The validity of the issue for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lower Colorado River Authority v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Aransas Pass v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Wharton County Drainage Dist. No. 1 v. HigbeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Brown v. WheelockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Consolidated Independent School District v. Texas Political Subdivisions Property/Casualty Joint Self-Insurance FundTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bennett v. Brown County Water Improvement District No. OneTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Rosenberg Development Corporation v. Imperial Performing Arts, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Maple Run at Austin Municipal Utility District v. MonaghanTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Willacy County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. AbendrothTexas Supreme Court · 1944

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API