Legal Opinion

Maple Run at Austin Municipal Utility District v. Monaghan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1996No. 96-0489PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

Section 43.082 of the Texas Local Government Code, enacted in 1995 and expiring on the last day of 1996, purportedly authorizes certain municipal utility districts lying within a municipality’s extraterritorial jurisdiction to dissolve, requiring the affected municipality to take ownership of the district’s assets and assume its debts. Because of extremely specific requirements about the amount and character of outstanding debt and other factors, Maple Run at Austin Municipal Utility District is the only district in the state qualifying for the special treatment under…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Smith v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Anderson v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Robinson v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Clark, Sheriff v. Finley, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Owens Corning v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Williams v. Houston Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API