Rosenberg Development Corporation v. Imperial Performing Arts, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman
The sovereign immunity doctrine prohibits suits against the government without the state's consent. Though rooted in the feudal fiction that the "king can do no wrong,"1 modern justifications for sovereign immunity are political, pecuniary, and pragmatic.2 Among other benefits, sovereign immunity maintains equilibrium among the branches of government by honoring "the allocation of responsibility" for resolving disputes with the state.3 The immunity doctrine also protects the public coffers by deferring to the Legislature's policy decisions about "when to allow tax resources to be shifted…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Wichita Falls State Hospital v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- 152 Lakewest Community, LP and Supreme Development Corporation v. Ameristar Apartment Services, L.P. D/B/A Ameristar Screen & Glass, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
- Acclaim Physician Group, Inc. v. Kierra Wright and Domoniqe Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2023
- Albertson Companies, Inc. v. County of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024
- Allen Frick v. Jonathan Jergins, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2022
- Austin Independent School District v. Rodney Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.