Legal Opinion

Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. McCraw

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1936No. 7021PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This is an original proceeding brought by the Relator against the Attorney General for writ of mandamus directing that officer to approve proposed bonds of the District in the sum of $3,600,000.00 as provided by law. The District was created by Chapter 13, Local and Special Laws of the Forty-first Legislature, Second Called Session, and became effective October 2, 1929. There are subsequent acts touching the subject matter of this proceeding, but Chapter 368, General and Special Laws of the First Called Session of the Forty-fourth Legislature, sometimes referred to as Senate Bill No. 3,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Lower Colorado River Authority v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of Aransas Pass v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bexar County v. LindenTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. City of Dayton v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Gulf Ins. Co. v. James, St. Treas.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Texas Public Building Authority v. MattoxTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Harris County Flood Control District v. MannTexas Supreme Court · 1940

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API