Legal Opinion

Krinsk v. Fund Asset Management, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 27, 1988No. 85 Civ. 8428 (JMW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, District Judge:

Index to the Opinion

Introduction. 475

I. Background. 476

A. The CMA Program. 476

B. Merrill Lynch & Co. and its Affiliates. 478

C. Fees Paid by the Fund and its Shareholders. 478

L The Service Fee.. 479

2. The Advisory Fee. 479

3. The 12b-l Payments. 479

D. The Trustees . 479

L Information Available to the Trustees. 479

2. Consideration of the Advisory Fee .... 481

E. The 12b-l Plan. 482

T. Adoption oI the Plan. 482

2. Continuation of ttuTPlan. 484

II. The Law. 485

III. Findings And Conclusions as to the § 36(b) Claims Introduction — The Fund as a Component of the CMA Program.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Spielman v. General Host CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  5. Krinsk v. Fund Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Krinsk v. Fund Asset Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. In re Blackrock Mut. Funds Advisory Fee Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  3. Kalish v. Franklin Advisers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Forsythe v. Sun Life Financial, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  5. Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API