Legal Opinion

Forsythe v. Sun Life Financial, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 22, 2007No. Civil Action 04-10584-GAOPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

O’TOOLE, District Judge.

The defendants contend that in an action for breach of fiduciary duty under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“ICA”), 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b), any damages that may be awarded are limited to the one-year period immediately preceding the commencement of the action. In this case, the complaint was filed on March 25, 2004, and the defendants seek a protective order limiting permissible discovery to “documents that contain or reflect responsive information relating to the fees charged and services provided during the period March 26, 2003 to March 25,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cape Ann Investors v. LeponeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Grossman v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
  4. Tarlov v. Paine Webber Cashfund, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
  5. King v. DouglassDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. Darling'sSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  2. King v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  3. Owens v. City of MaldenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API