Legal Opinion
Kalish v. Franklin Advisers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 24, 1990No. 87 Civ. 6919 (CSH)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Lucyle Kalish and Sol Joseph Kamen brought this derivative action on behalf of defendant Franklin Custodian Funds, Inc. (U.S. Government Securities Series) (the "Fund”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq. (the “Act”), to recoup allegedly excessive advisory fees paid by the Fund to its investment adviser.
Franklin Custodian Funds, Inc. is a diversified open-end investment company registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Act. The Fund is one of five series of Franklin…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Krinsk v. Fund Asset Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Green v. Fund Asset Management, L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In re Blackrock Mut. Funds Advisory Fee Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- In re Evergreen Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Kalish v. Franklin Advisers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Pirundini v. J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgmt. Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.