Legal Opinion
Biller Associates v. Peterken
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 30, 2000No. AC 17768; AC 17850PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
In this action for breach of an employment contract, the defendants, William H. Peterken, Jill Peterken and Ridgely W. Brown, appeal from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered after a trial to the court. William Peterken and Jill Peterken claim that the court improperly (1) found that the plaintiff, Biller Associates, had a valid and enforceable contract, (2) found in favor of the plaintiff on its quantum meruit claim, (3) calculated damages and (4) denied the named defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Brown claims that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burns v. KoellmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Swenson v. SawoskaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Otto Contracting Co. v. S. Schinella & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- John T. Brady & Co. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Biller Associates v. PeterkenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Jaser v. FischerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Rosenblit v. LascheverConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Executive Services, Inc. v. KarwowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.