Legal Opinion

Executive Services, Inc. v. Karwowski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 4, 2003No. AC 23686PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

For a fee, public insurance adjusters assist property owners in receiving insurance payments for insured fire losses. Section 38a-788-6 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, which determines the fee that insurance adjusters may charge, permits them to recover a fixed percentage “of the amount of the loss when adjusted with the Insurance Companies or otherwise recovered . . . ,”1 The issue in this case *126is whether the amount “otherwise recovered” is the gross amount of the insured’s recovery or the net amount after an insured has paid attorney’s fees and mortgage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Biller Associates v. Route 156 Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Biller Associates v. Rte. 156 Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Biller Associates v. PeterkenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Rudy's Limousine Service, Inc. v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Salem Subway RestaurantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Jacaruso v. LebskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Executive Services, Inc. v. KarwowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Jacaruso v. LebskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Jacaruso v. LebskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API