Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Goff

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 14, 2004No. 03SC116PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

In this legal malpractice action, Petitioner Cory A. Morrison appeals the court of appeals’ decision affirming summary judgment in favor of Respondent Richard J. Goff. The court of appeals held that the statute of limitations for negligence actions barred Morrison’s claims. We must decide whether in a legal malpractice action brought by a criminal defendant, the statute of limitations is tolled while the defendant pursues appellate or posteonviction relief in the underlying criminal proceeding. 1 We hold that a criminal defendant’s direct appeal or action for postconviction relief does not…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Steele v. KehoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  5. Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Fogle v. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Brodeur v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. Rantz v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Braxton v. ZavarasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API