Legal Opinion
Fogle v. Pierson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 27, 2006No. 05-1405PublishedCited by 523 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Ronald Fogle, a prisoner appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging various civil rights violations committed by the Colorado Department of Corrections (“DOC”). He also argues that the district court failed to consider a number of claims that he raised in his pleadings. As Fogle was granted in forma pauperis (“IFF ”) status at the district court, any claim that is frivolous must be dismissed. Having reviewed his myriad claims, we conclude that not all are frivolous. We therefore AFFIRM in part,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by523 opinions
- Gee v. PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Trujillo v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Ernest Porter v. Pennsylvania Department of CorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- McCarty v. GilchristCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Lowe v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
518 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.