Chatman v. Compania de Navegacao, Lloyd Brasileiro
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.
This is a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended). Plaintiff, a negro longshoreman, alleges that, while in the employ of the defendant company, he was injured by the falling of two sacks of coffee, which struck the handle of a truck, with the result that the truck handle struck petitioner in the back, “causing a severe contusion of petitioner’s back and that this jolt, jar and blow and the contusion caused thereby did and has severely aggravated the hypertrophic arthritis of petitioner’s lumbar spine.” He prayed for compensation at the rate of $20 a week and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Levy v. McWilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Menzel v. Southern Stevedoring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Rylander v. T. Smith & Sons, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bolden v. Plant Line Stevedoring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Riley v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Preston v. Ramoneda Bros.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.