Legal Opinion

Chatman v. Compania de Navegacao, Lloyd Brasileiro

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1932No. 14100PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

This is a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended). Plaintiff, a negro longshoreman, alleges that, while in the employ of the defendant company, he was injured by the falling of two sacks of coffee, which struck the handle of a truck, with the result that the truck handle struck petitioner in the back, “causing a severe contusion of petitioner’s back and that this jolt, jar and blow and the contusion caused thereby did and has severely aggravated the hypertrophic arthritis of petitioner’s lumbar spine.” He prayed for compensation at the rate of $20 a week and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Levy v. McWilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Menzel v. Southern Stevedoring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Rylander v. T. Smith & Sons, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Bolden v. Plant Line Stevedoring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Riley v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Preston v. Ramoneda Bros.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API