Rylander v. T. Smith & Sons, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.
This is a suit for compensation. The plaintiff, a longshoreman, was injured under circumstances admittedly entitling him to compensation. The contention in the case involves the length of time for which compensation is due and the amount. There was judgment below awarding plaintiff $20 a week from April 14,1932, to July 14,1932. Defendant has appealed, contending that plaintiff’s disability began on the 14th of April and ended on the 16th of May, and that the amount to be allowed him should be the result of an average of his earnings extending over a certain period of time, rather than the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chatman v. Compania de Navegacao, Lloyd BrasileiroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bolden v. Plant Line Stevedoring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Franklin v. J. P. Floria & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Preston v. Ramoneda Bros.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Reynolds v. Forcum-James Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Beco v. T. Smith & Sons, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.