Legal Opinion

Preston v. Ramoneda Bros.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1934No. 14572PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Judge.

Plaintiff, a colored laborer, claims that he was permanently and totally disabled as a result of an injury received while trucking staves, in the defendant’s employment,' and that he is entitled to compensation for 400 weeks. The defendant filed a general denial.

There was judgment, in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for, subject to a credit of $234, representing compensation at the rate of $15.-60 per week for fifteen weeks previously paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

Defendant contends, first, that the evidence does not sustain the finding of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King v. American Tank & Equipment Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Price v. Gilliland Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Yelverton v. Louisiana Cent. Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Chatman v. Compania de Navegacao, Lloyd BrasileiroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Menzel v. Southern Stevedoring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Forcum-James Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Montaner v. Comisión Industrial de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
  3. Montaner v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API