Legal Opinion

Menzel v. Southern Stevedoring Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1928No. 10,882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

While plaintiff’s husband was engaged in working as a longshoreman for the defendant he was killed. His widow sues under the Employers’ Liability Acts. She sues the employer and the surety company.

She alleges that at the time of her husband’s death, he was earning eighty cents an hour during eight hours of the day, aggregating $6.40 per day according to which she is entitled to recover 32% per cent or $12.47 per week for 300 weeks from June 21, 1926.

For answer, the defendant, Southern Stevedoring Company, admitted that the plaintiff was the widow of the deceased and that he was employed by it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dick v. Gravel Logging Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Serio v. TrainorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  3. Veasey v. PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. Wilson v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Wright v. Louisiana Ice & Utilities Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. King v. American Tank & Equipment Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Chatman v. Compania de Navegacao, Lloyd BrasileiroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Bolden v. Plant Line Stevedoring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API