Legal Opinion

Bolden v. Plant Line Stevedoring Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1936No. 16441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

Plaintiff, a longshoreman, brought this suit against his employer for workmen’s compensation at the maximum rate of $20 per week for a period of 22 ^eek?, subject to a credit of $10.20 per week paid him during fifteen weeks. The defendant resisted • plaintiff’s demand upon three grounds:(1) The prescription of one year under section 31 of the Compensation Law.(2) No further compensation is due plaintiff under subsection 3 of section 8 of Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended; and,(3) If said subsection 3 of section 8 of the Compensation Act, as amended, be construed so as to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Ward & Gow v. KrinskySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. King v. American Tank & Equipment Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ford v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Watkins v. May Bros. Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Moore v. AysenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Johnson v. W. L. Richeson & Sons, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Mertz v. Von SchlemmerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API