Legal Opinion
Vieregge v. N.C. State University
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 17, 1992No. 9110IC357PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
G.S. 97-84 in pertinent part provides:
The Commission or any of its members shall hear the parties at issue and their representatives and witnesses, and shall determine the dispute in a summary manner. The award, together with a statement of the findings of fact, rulings of law, and other matters pertinent to the questions at issue shall be filed ....
G.S. 97-85 further provides:. . . the full Commission shall review the award, and, if good ground be shown therefor, reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and, if…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Joyner v. Rocky Mount MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- HAND BY HAND v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kisiah v. W.R. Kisiah Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Whitfield v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Crump v. Independence NissanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Cialino v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Tucker v. Workable Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.