Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Rocky Mount Mills

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1988No. 8810IC531PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the North Carolina Industrial Commission erred in dismissing or denying plaintiffs claim for “future medical expenses.” We note at the outset that the Commission in its order filed 17 December 1987 stated that “plaintiffs motion for the payment of future medical expenses should be dismissed,” but that it further ordered that the motions should be “denied.” We treat the order as one dismissing plaintiffs motion rather than one denying the motion because in reality the Commission did not rule on the motion. It merely…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brewer v. POWERS TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Thompson v. Refrigerated Transport Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Shore v. Chatham Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Strickland v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Clark v. ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Abernathy v. Sandoz Chemicals/Clariant Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Vieregge v. N.C. State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Lee v. RosesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Matthews v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API