Legal Opinion

Cialino v. Wal-Mart Stores

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 2003No. COA02-412PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, Debra Cialino contends that the full Commission erred in awarding her temporary partial disability because the record reflects her entitlement to a presumption of total disability. On the other hand, her employer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. argues the full Commission erred by concluding Ms. Cialino had a compensable occupational disease attributable to her employment with Wal-Mart. After carefully reviewing the record, we hold the Commission’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence. Accordingly, “the [] Commission’s findings of fact…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Clark v. Wal-MartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Whitfield v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Ramsey v. Southern Industrial Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Lane v. American National Can Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Matthews v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API