McClintock v. Young Republicans
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 183, Jan. T., 1904, by-defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1904, No. 1525, granting peremptory mandamus in ease of John McClintock, Jr., v. Young Republicans of Philadelphia, Philip H. Johnson, President, and George L. Harvey, Corresponding Secretary. Petition for mandamus. Before Brégy, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned among others was in issuing the writ of peremptory mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Mestbezat,
■ The association known as the Young Republicans of Philadelphia, one of the defendants in this proceeding, was incorporated by a decree of the court of common pleas No. 1 of Philadelphia county in 1881. The object of the corporation as set forth in its charter is : “ To unite in a social and political organization the young men of Philadelphia; to foster and promote a love for, and a knowledge of, the principles of the republican party ; to educate the young men to a loftier appreciation of their relations to the national, state and municipal governments ; to…
2Cited by14 opinions
- New Brighton Borough v. New Brighton Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Boldt v. St. Cloud Milk Producers' Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Goldman v. Trans-United Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- State Ex Rel. G. M. Gustafson Co. v. Crookston Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Sto-Rox Focus on Renewal Neighborhood Corp. v. KingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.