Cohen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Walter W. Cohen, the Consumer Advocate of Pennsylvania (Consumer Advocate) here appeals a final order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) which established rates for the Pennsylvania Power Company (Power Company), an electric utility company serving portions of northwestern Pennsylvania. We affirm the order of the PUC.
The controversy in this case is focused on that part of the PUC order which allowed the Power Company to normalize deferred federal and state income taxes for ratemaking purposes.1 Under the Internal *356Revenue Code a corporation may accelerate the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- UGI Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Green v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- University of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984