Legal Opinion
Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 9, 1985No. 31 Western District Appeal Docket, 1984PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Justice.
I
The Consumer Advocate appeals by allowance Commonwealth Court’s order affirming the Public Utility Commission in a rate case. In dealing with the rates proposed in Pennsylvania Power Company’s Tariff Supplement No. 15 the Commission allowed the Company to “normalize” 1 both its federal and state taxes for three separate classes of property: (1) property placed in service between 1971 and 1980, (2) property placed in service in 1980 and (3) property placed in service after January 1, 1981. The Commission’s order approved the setting of rates on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Cohen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.