Legal Opinion

Grier v. Kramer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1917No. 7988PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Tullía County M. A. Breckenridge, Judge. Action by Lorenzo Crier against John T. Kramer ana others to enjoin sale of land for nonpayment of sewer assessment. A demurrer was sustained to the petition, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BUREORD, C.

Plaintiff, owner of certain lots m the city of Tulsa, sought to enjoin their sale for nonpayment of certain sewer assessments. He attacks the law (chapter 15, art. 16, Comp. Laws 1909) under wmch the proceedings relating to the construction of the sewer were had and unuer which the contract therefor was let as unconstitutional upon the ground that It provides for assessment by area rather than directly according to the peculiar benefits derived by the abutting property. The (question was fully determined against the plaintiff’s contention in City of Perry v. Davis &…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. City of Perry v. Davis & YoungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Lonsinger v. City of Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Edmonds v. Town of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Bocox v. Town of BixbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. City of Maud v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API