Legal Opinion
Edmonds v. Town of Haskell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 30, 1926No. 15937PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This proceeding was originally instituted to enjoin the collection of certain assessments levied by the town of Haskell for street paving and has been before this court in a former appeal.
The alleged right to the - relief sought was based upon the contention that chapter 176, S. L. 1919, under which the paving in question -was done, is unconstitutional.
The title of the act in question is as follows :
“An act providing for the establishing and changing of the grade of any street, avenue, land, alley or other public place in any incorporated town in the state of Oklahoma, having a population qf…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Muskogee v. RamboSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Alley v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Edwards v. ThrashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Grable v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- White v. Board of Education of Silver CityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.