Legal Opinion
Khan v. K2 Pure Solutions, LP
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 2, 2013No. Case No. 12-cv-05526-WHOPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION
Re: Dkt. No. 45
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
On September 3, 2013, the Court denied the plaintiffs’ Partial Motion for Summary *863Judgment on their First and Second Causes of Action and ordered supplemental briefing on the issue of whether attorney’s fees accrued in defending the Nevada and Ohio actions constitute an injury in fact sufficient to confer standing on the plaintiffs under California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). Dkt. No. 63. The Court incorporates the factual and procedural…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hodgers-Durgin v. De La VinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.