Hodgers-Durgin v. De La Vina
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
The question in this case is whether two individual plaintiffs may bring a class action for equitable relief against officials of the United States Border Patrol who supervise operations along the Mexican bor*1039der in the state of Arizona. Plaintiffs, who each were stopped once by Border Patrol agents, contend that the stops violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable seizures. They seek equitable relief, asking in their complaint for a declaratory judgment that “the roving patrol operations [of the Border Patrol] involve systemic violations of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by286 opinions
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Kelly N. Pryor Warren E. Spivey, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Ellen Keates v. Michael KoileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.