Legal Opinion

State v. Buchanan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 2005No. COA04-1089PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Recently, in Viar v. N.C. Dep’t of Transp., 359 N.C. 400, 402, 610 S.E.2d 360, 361 (2005), 1 our Supreme Court admonished this Court to avoid applying Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure even in instances where a party’s “Rules violations did not impede comprehension of the issues on appeal or frustrate the appellate process.” Defendant, recognizing that he has not preserved the grounds for his appeal from convictions of maintaining a dwelling to keep a controlled substance, manufacturing marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia, asks this Court to invoke Rule 2 to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. DennisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Davis v. Columbus County SchoolsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Broderick v. BroderickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API