Legal Opinion

State v. Johnston

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 2005No. COA04-1283PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Cynthia Johnston (“defendant”) presents the following issues for our consideration: Did the trial court err by (I) failing to instruct the jury regarding an essential element of felonious damage to computers; (II) denying her motion to dismiss; and (III) entering judgment on a fatally flawed indictment. After careful review, we vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for entry of judgment and sentence on the misdemeanor offense of damaging computers.

The State presented evidence at trial tending to show the following: Dr. Thomas Kirby (“Dr. Kirby”) is an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. CokerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Broderick v. BroderickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. MathisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Binney v. Banner Therapy ProductsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Binney v. Banner Therapy ProductsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API