Broderick v. Broderick
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
"The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory and `failure to *807follow these rules will subject an appeal to dismissal.'" Viar v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., 359 N.C. 400, 401, 610 S.E.2d 360, 360 (2005) (quoting Steingress v. Steingress, 350 N.C. 64, 65, 511 S.E.2d 298, 299 (1999)). In this case, plaintiff Gerald S. Broderick has failed to comply with Rule 10(c)(1) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, and we therefore dismiss his appeal.
Rule 10(c) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure states in relevant part:(1) Form; Record references. A…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Steingress v. SteingressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hammonds v. LUMBEE RIVER ELEC. M'SHIP CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Womack Newspapers, Inc. v. Town of Kitty Hawk Ex Rel. Kitty Hawk Town CouncilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Hammonds v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Jones v. Harrelson & Smith Contractors, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.