Legal Opinion

State v. Dennison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 2005No. 179A04PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, the Court of Appeals held that defendant was prejudiced when evidence of prior violent acts he committed against his former girlfriend, Melanie Tellado, was admitted at trial. However, even assuming arguendo that the admission of this evidence was error, defendant waived his right to appellate review of this issue because he failed to object when Tellado testified. See N.C. R. App. P. 10(b)(1) (a party must timely object to preserve a question for appellate review); see also State v. Roache, 358 N.C. 243, 292, 595 S.E.2d 381, 413 (2004) (A motion in limine fails to preserve for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. ValentineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. BeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. People v. DensonIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. MareadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. TuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API