Legal Opinion

Young v. Department of Fish & Game

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1981No. Civ. 25044PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZIEBARTH, J. *

I

Statement of the Case

This case, which is apparently a case of first impression, involves the validity of regulations adopted by appellant, California Fish and Game Commission (hereinafter referred to as Commission), to regulate commercial activity regarding two species of wildlife (i.e., reptiles and amphibians). The regulations permitted commercial collecting of these two species for scientific and educational purposes, but prohibited such activity for the pet trade. Respondents, who are or were commercial collectors, challenged the regulations (Cal. Admin. Code, tit.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Kaiser v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. County Sanitation District No. 2 v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Personal Watercraft Coalition v. Marin County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Colorado Real Estate Commission v. BartlettColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Smith v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Smart Corner Owners Assn. v. CJUF Smart Corner LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API