Legal Opinion
Chism v. Majors
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 26, 1923No. 11454PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DICKSON, 0.
This is an appeal from a judgment in the district court of Jefferson county. It appears that the defendant in error had been in .possession of a tract of land in said county for several years under leases ei lecuted by Willie Alexander, a full blood Indian of the Five Civilized Tribes, said lauds being the home-si ead allotment of said Alexander.
On the 29th day of October. 1918, and while the defendant in' error was in possession of said lands under a previous lease, the allottee executed a new lease to defendant in error to commence on January 1, 1919. and to expire on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Richardson v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- City of Oklahoma City v. Hill Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Brown v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Carden v. HumbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Midland Oil Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Carter v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Curtis v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Flynt v. HastingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Endicott v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.