Legal Opinion
Shively v. Dye Creek Cattle Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1994No. C016355PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
In this personal injury action, plaintiffs sued the defendant (Dye Creek) after their car struck one of Dye Creek’s black Angus bulls that was positioned on the roadway of State Highway 44 in Lassen County. The collision occurred at night and pitted the plaintiffs’ 1977 Toyota Corolla against a bull that weighed approximately 1,200 to 1,500 pounds. Finding that Dye Creek owed no duty to plaintiffs because plaintiffs had not set forth any basis to establish that duty, the trial court granted Dye Creek a summary judgment. We reverse.
Background
The facts of the collision are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Smith v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Andersen,. v. Two Dot Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Herzberg v. County of PlumasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Minnegren v. NozarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.