State v. Cole
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.
Police seized a firearm from an automobile in which defendant was a passenger and the state charged him under ORS 166.270 with being a felon in possession of a firearm. At arraignment, defendant, who is not a lawyer, appeared without counsel and stated that he would represent himself. The arraignment court gave no advice concerning the right to counsel or the perils of representing oneself. The court appointed an unnamed lawyer, who was present in the courtroom, to “fill in” as defendant’s counsel during arraignment only.
Defendant later moved to suppress the firearm, and represented himself…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. VernaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. SperouOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. PittOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. WhitmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Ryan v. PalmateerOregon Supreme Court · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.