Kohl v. Lytle Creek Water & Improvement Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Plaintiff brought this action against Raymond Carroll and Alice C. Carroll to quiet title to thirty shares of the capital stock of the Lytle Creek Water and Improvement Company and to compel that corporation to transfer the stock on its books and issue a new certificate to him. Plaintiff had judgment and Mr. and Mrs. Carroll have appealed. We will hereafter refer to Mr. and Mrs. Carroll as the defendants and to the corporate defendant as the water company.
In 1922 plaintiff and Walter Kohl sold property to Raymond Carroll. Two notes in the principal sum of $20,000 each, one payable to O. H.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Buckner v. A. Leon & Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Payne v. NeuvalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Greathouse v. DalenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baldus v. MatternNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- MacDonald v. Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Berverdor, Inc. v. Salyer FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Chamberlain v. GuglielmettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953