Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Guglielmetti

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1953No. Civ. No. 15364Published

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for the balance due upon a written contract for the construction of an auto laundry. Defendant filed a cross-complaint alleging minor defects, and omissions in performance under the contract. At the outset *65of the trial the parties stipulated as to the contract, the amount due for work performed under it, and the amount due for extra work performed by plaintiff. The parties then agreed that the issues to be tried were those raised in the cross-complaint.

It was developed that, defendant had previously executed a similar contract with two corporations which had done the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buckner v. A. Leon & Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Kohl v. Lytle Creek Water & Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API