Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Eikenberry v. Frodert

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 18, 1996No. 18650-1-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

Frodert was convicted of leading organized

crime and other related drug charges. Then the State obtained a $250,000 civil judgment against Frodert based on his violation of the Criminal Profiteering Act. Frodert appeals the civil judgment, arguing that it violates the double jeopardy clause and the excessive fines clause of the Eighth Amendment. He also contends that the Criminal Profiteering Act is unconstitutional because it violates due process. Finally, he asserts that he was denied his constitutional right to legal counsel. We hold that the civil judgment in this case did not violate the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CatlettWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CatlettWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Winchester v. SteinWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Winchester v. SteinWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API