Legal Opinion

Winchester v. Stein

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1998No. 65553-7PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

In this case, we are asked whether an action brought under our state’s Criminal Profiteering Act for monetary damages to victims of crime and other penalties violated the double jeopardy rights of those parties who had been previously tried in criminal proceedings.

FACTS

There is a large record in this case, but only a brief description of the facts is necessary to understand the legal issue before us. Ned Hall, a probate attorney in Vancouver, served as Nick Stein’s attorney for a number of years in matters involving Nick’s property. Nick’s son, Jack Stein, *840opposed Mr. Hall’s legal position on…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Trujillo v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. LinvilleWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Campbell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re Detention of CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API