Legal Opinion

State v. Catlett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1997No. 64266-4PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

— We are asked yet again to enter the "maelstrom of judicial activity,” to determine if the civil forfeiture of a person’s automobile used to facilitate a drug transaction bars a subsequent criminal prosecution for the drug transaction on state and federal constitutional double jeopardy grounds. After United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267, 116 S. Ct. 2135, 135 L. Ed. 2d 549 (1996), the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not bar such prosecution. We hold article I, section 9 of the Washington Constitution does not bar such prosecution as well. We reverse the decision of the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Harmon v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. City of Bellevue v. LorangWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Bellevue v. LorangWashington Supreme Court · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API