Wiener v. H. Graff & Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of. Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to recover the possession of certain real property situated in the city of Fresno, alleged to be unlawfully withheld from plaintiff by defendants. Defendants claim possession under the provisions of a lease from the owner to H. Graff & Co., and by subleases by the latter.
It appears that the property in question was the subject of a lease between the owner, one J. J. Konigshofer, as lessor, and H. Graff & Company, a copartnership, lessees, dated December 1, 1899, for the term of five years, from its date, at the yearly rental of $1,500, payable monthly in advance, on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Sheppard v. RosenkransWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Shamp v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Howell v. City of Hamburg Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- United States v. 70.39 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Becker v. Submarine Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Helena Light & Ry. Co. v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.